Targeted to Intermediate English (B1+) speakers.Read more
This is the standard requirement for most courses. Participants at this level can participate actively in discussions and manage everyday and professional situations. If they are unsure about their English level, they can test it here or explore our courses facilitated in Basic English.
Secondary Teachers.Read more
The listed audiences are those for whom the course is especially recommended, but courses are not exclusive to them and are open to everyone. In fact, most of our workshops are built around the collective sharing of participants’ experiences and having a variety of profiles enriches the learning process and is highly encouraged!
Description
Students today are constantly exposed to information coming from almost any kind of source: social media, online platforms, digital networks, etc.
However, access to information doesn’t automatically lead to understanding. In fact, it often implies almost the opposite.
Many students struggle to evaluate sources, recognise bias, and distinguish between reliable information and manipulation.
In other words: do you think your students are really able to distinguish well-reasoned arguments from emotional manipulation?
Helping students navigate today’s complex information landscape has become one of the most pressing challenges for educators.
As a matter of fact, the consequences extend far beyond academic performance: an inability to evaluate information critically undermines students’ capacity to make informed decisions about their health, relationships, future, and role as democratic citizens.
That’s the reason why this course offers a concrete and classroom-ready approach to teaching critical thinking as a practical, transferable skill embedded across subjects.
It will not be considered just an abstract concept; on the contrary, participants will learn how to integrate it into realistic school curricula.
Throughout the course, participants will engage with key frameworks for reasoning and argumentation.
They will explore the Paul-Elder model of reasoning and learn to identify logical fallacies and cognitive biases, then immediately apply this through practical tools: the CRAAP test for source credibility, Google Reverse Image Search for verifying visuals and videos, the Traffic Light System for rapid evaluation, the 5 Whys technique for uncovering assumptions, Claim-Evidence-Reasoning for building arguments, and the Ladder of Inference to reveal how we jump from data to conclusions.
The participants will also learn to use international fact-checking databases (AFP Fact Check, Reuters Fact Check, Full Fact) and Google Fact Check Explorer to verify claims across global sources.
Rather than treating critical thinking as a stand-alone subject, the course demonstrates how analytical reasoning becomes a shared language across the entire school, whether evaluating scientific evidence, deconstructing historical bias, analysing literature or identifying statistical manipulation.
These frameworks and digital verification tools can transform classroom discussions into opportunities for democratic dialogue where students learn to argue from evidence, expose misinformation, listen to opposing views, and engage constructively with disagreement.
By the end of the course, participants will leave with practical ideas, adaptable tools, and a clearer understanding of how to support students in becoming thoughtful, informed, and responsible individuals in the information age.
What is included
Learning outcomes
The course will help participants to:
- Recognize their own cognitive biases and thinking patterns, and understand the role of self-awareness in teaching critical thinking;
- Explain key principles of reasoning, including common logical fallacies and cognitive biases;
- Design classroom activities that develop critical thinking across subjects and age groups;
- Use practical tools such as the CRAAP test and reverse image search to help students identify misinformation;
- Guide students in analysing sources, questioning assumptions and evaluating information critically;
- Facilitate discussions where students build arguments using evidence and engage in respectful, structured debate;
- Connect critical thinking to active citizenship, helping students understand its role in informed decision-making and democratic participation.
Tentative schedule
Day 1 – Introduction to the course
- Introduction to the course and the Academy;
- Introduction to the host city and the week’s cultural activities;
- Icebreaker activities;
- Presentations of the participants’ schools and institutions.
Foundations of critical thinking
- What is critical thinking? Key concepts and relevance in today’s classroom;
- Introduction to the Paul-Elder model;
- Identify cognitive biases through interactive exercises (Confirmation Bias, Anchoring Effect);
- Practical Activities: analyze logical fallacies in advertisements and everyday arguments (Logical Fallacy Taxonomy, False Dilemma).
Day 2 – Fighting misinformation and media literacy
- Distinguish between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation;
- Why fake news spreads: psychological and social factors;
- Practical tools for source evaluation:
- CRAAP Test;
- Google Reverse Image Search;
- InVID.
- Introduction to fact-checking platforms and online verification (AFP Fact Check, Reuters Fact Check, Full Fact, Google Fact Check Explorer);
- Hands-on workshop: analysing real online content.
Day 3 – Argumentation and democracy
- Explore the different styles of rhetoric;
- Learn to distinguish facts, opinions, and evidence-based claims using the Toulmin Model and Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) framework;
- Discussion strategies:
- Think–Pair–Share;
- Fishbowl.
- Facilitating respectful and structured classroom dialogue.
Day 4 – Interdisciplinary learning and cross-curricular planning
- Critical thinking in different disciplines:
- science (evidence vs pseudoscience);
- history (bias and sources);
- language (rhetoric and persuasion);
- data (basic statistical interpretation: identify manipulation in data).
- Group work: designing subject-specific activities;
- Developing simple assessment strategies and classroom tasks.
Day 5 – Active citizenship, assessment and action planning
- Connect critical thinking to democratic responsibility;
- Design assessment rubrics and performance tasks;
- Present your take-home project and receive peer feedback;
- Course evaluation: round-up of acquired competencies, feedback, and discussions;
- Awarding of the course Certificate of Attendance.
Day 6 – Structured cultural activities
- Structured cultural activity(ies) according to the hosting location;
- Learning journal: individual written reflection on the course experience;
- Course reflection: self-reflection and review of course materials and resources.
Download or share
Get weekly recaps on confirmed sessions!
